Petrus Romanus

Anti-pope Francis is NOT Petrus Romanus (in English Peter the Roman) as prophesied by St. Malachy so many hundreds of years ago.

The final pope prophecy is as follows: “In extreme persecution, in the final persecution of the Holy Roman [Catholic] Church, there will sit Peter the Roman [a pope], who will pasture his sheep in many tribulations, and when these things are finished, the city of seven hills [Rome] will be destroyed, and the dreadful judge will judge his people. The End.”

Notice the emphasized text – pasturing the sheep is only what good popes do. An anti-pope is a wolf in sheep’s clothing, and hence cannot truly pasture the sheep. Therefore this anti-pope is not Petrus Romanus, who instead is a good – and final – pope yet to come.

Rather anti-pope Francis is the Biblical False Prophet, for which this site is dedicated to expose.

UPDATE January 2014

Some people incorrectly interpret Maria Divine Mercy’s (MDM) prophecy about Peter the Roman as being literally St. Peter ruling the church from Heaven. That is a heretical interpretation of the prophecy. The prophecy is not wrong, but those who interpret the prophecy as such are mistaken. The dogma of the Church from Vatican Council I (one) says there will always be a pope on earth while the Church exists, which means until the end of the world. The end of the world doesn’t happen until after the end of the 1000 (symbolic number) year New Era (also commonly called the Reign of Peace or Era of Peace, also mentioned at Fatima).

In addition, the indefectibility of the Church indicates the same – no fundamental structure changes can occur in the papacy (nor the proposed doctrinal authority of bishop conferences mentioned in Evangelii Gaudium):

By this term is signified, not merely that the Church will persist to the end of time, but further, that it will be preserved unimpaired in its essential characteristics. The Church can never undergo any constitutional change, which will make it, as a social organism, something different from what it was originally. It can never become corrupt in faith or in morals; nor can it ever lose the Apostolic hierarchy, or the Sacraments through which Christ communicates grace to men.” (Catholic Encyclopedia)

So how is MDM’s prophecy to be interpreted? Exactly like the Biblical precendent of St. John the Baptist. Recall that St. John was called (like MDM!) an angel (Matthew 11:10). Any real Catholic should know that the term “angel” is really a job description meaning “messenger.” From Catholic Encyclopedia: “(Latin angelus; Greek aggelos; from the Hebrew for “one going” or “one sent”; messenger). The word is used in Hebrew to denote indifferently either a divine or human messenger. The Septuagint renders it by aggelos which also has both significations.” Hence anyone who says that MDM’s prophecies are false because MDM is called an angel are utterly incompetent in prophetic interpretation for something so simple and obvious that they cannot be trusted to interpret anything more subtle. Their “discernment” is hogwash.

Now onto St. Peter and his relationship to St. Peter the Roman. As already stated, but to repeat for emphasis, St. Peter, the first pope, cannot literally rule the Church from Heaven because that goes against dogma. Therefore, using the exact same Biblical precedent of St. John the Baptist, recall that he was called “Elijah” (Elias in old naming convention) as explained in Matthew 11:14. Obviously St. John the Baptist was not literally Elijah (e.g. not reincarnated) and so the interpretation means that St. John the Baptist has the spirit of Elijah. The Douay-Rheims Bible notes for that verse say “He is Elias: Not in person, but in spirit. St. Luke 1. 17.” Luke 1:17 includes the text “And he shall go before him in the spirit and power of Elias (Elijah).” Hence, Peter the Roman is a real human man on earth who will have the spirit of St. Peter in Heaven. The last pope has the spirit of the first pope. Logical, isn’t it? God’s bookends for the Vicar of His Church. And, in fact, there are prophecies about that.

Blessed Elizabeth Canori Mora (d. 1825) received various revelations about the crisis in the Church. She was beatified in 1994. Her prophecies about a pope include:

After purifying punishments, such as the Warning, she saw Saint Peter return on a majestic papal throne together with Saint Paul, who went through the world shackling the devils and bringing them before Saint Peter, who cast them back into the dark caverns from where they had come. “Then a beautiful splendor came over the earth, to announce the reconciliation of God with mankind.

The small flock of faithful Catholics who had taken refuge under the trees will be brought before Saint Peter, who will “choose a new pope. All the Church will be reordered according to the true dictates of the holy Gospel. The religious orders will be reestablished and the homes of Christians will become homes imbued with religion.” [Note: this is the billions of converts prophesied by MDM after the Warning.]

So great will be the fervor and zeal for the glory of God that everything will promote love of God and neighbor. The triumph, glory and honor of the Catholic Church will be established in an instant. She will be acclaimed, venerated and esteemed by all. All will resolve to follow Her, recognizing the Vicar of Christ as the Supreme Pontiff.

There is another prophetess with similar information, Blessed Anna Maria Taigi (d. 1837) who was Beatified by Pope Benedict XV in 1920.

After the three days of darkness [the first set associated with the Warning], St. Peter and St. Paul, having come down from Heaven, will preach in the whole world and designate a new Pope. A great light will flash from their bodies and will settle upon the cardinal who is to become Pope. Christianity, then, will spread throughout the world. He is the Holy Pontiff, chosen by God to withstand the storm. At the end, he will have the gift of miracles, and his name shall be praised over the whole earth. Whole nations will come back to the Church and the face of the earth will be renewed. Russia, England, and China will come into the Church.” [Note: the second set of 3 days of darkness is the Great Chastisement, that is immediately before the Second Coming. That is when the real rapture occurs.]

Therefore it is not a problem to interpret MDM and other prophecies in accordance with Church dogma on the last pope, Peter the Roman, a real human man on earth. As a corollary, realize that this last pope will live a very long life, until the end of the world. That is not new either, since in the early days of the world people lived a very long time, such as Mathusala for 969 years, and that is in an era of sin. Remember that death is the result of sin (Romans 5:12), hence a very long life is not a problem for an era without sin.

Come quickly Lord Jesus!

74 responses to “Petrus Romanus

  1. He could be both……

    Like

  2. Petrus Romanus was not on Malachy’s original list. That name wasn’t even added until 1820. http://www.osvdailytake.com/2013/02/the-prophecies-of-st-malachy-are-they.html

    Like

  3. So what do you want Catholics to do by this expose? Put up a new religion? Kill the Pope? Petition another conclave? What?

    Like

    • DeusServoNobis

      Just get yourself ready and make for darn sure you are following the right God. Repent and pray to God to show mercy on all the world. No need to make a new religion, just be a Christian. The beginning of God’s church on earth was created the moment Christ died on his cross for us. That is the foundation of the church and is your true religion. It is something nobody can ever take away from you but yourself. No need to kill anyone unless your life is being threatened so killing franny is not an option. In fact, there is nothing you can do to stop all this because it needs to happen. God is a man of His Word and speaks only truth. So do as He said and prepare yourself in every way you can for what is to come. Help others in the future when you can because countless people will be scared, angry and lost in these more dire times. Tell them that God is the Word and to pass it on. Elementary things. Do these.

      Like

  4. It is indeed and you cannot disprove it. No serious scholar believes Malachy’s list was even written by Malachy. It is most likely a forgery of the 16th century. There is no original manuscript in the Vatican archives in fact.

    Like

  5. Francis is indeed the False Prophet, and soon enough the whole world will realise….maybe when it’s too late.
    Im going to show this blog to as many people as I can.

    Like

  6. Anyone who says that a Pope could be the false prophet means that Satan has triumphed over the Catholic Church. That makes Jesus Christ a liar. “…on this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail.” (Mathew 16:18)

    Like

    • Mario de los Santos

      You are right Alex. Thing is the Pope is still Benedict XVI. And Francis in not a pope. “Pope Emeritus” is sacrilege.

      Like

      • Mario de los Santos

        Alex Lim. You have a point. If Joseph Ratzinger no longer carries his Fisherman Ring, nor his Mozzetta, then he must be “The Bishop Dressed in White” in the Fatima 3rd Secret. I don’t believe any other bishop would dress in white except for our beloved Benedict XVI. One other question is, if he is “the bishop dressed in white” plainly and simply dismissing “pope”, then, where would be the Papacy? God Blesses you ALL.

        Like

        • This is an excellent observation. Yes, POPE Benedict XVI is the “bishop in white” in the vision for the revealed portion of the third secret of Fatima. Only a pope is allowed to wear white, while regular bishops cannot.

          Like

    • It is true that as Jesus Christ said that …… ” … the gates of hell shall not prevail over the Church” but do not forget that Satan will try to destroy the Catholic Chuch by means of two men: The False Prophet which will create the false Chuch and the Antichrist. We are living in the times of Apocalypses written by John, The true Church will have to hide in refuges in order not to be killed and will have to face very cruel persecutions. But do not forget, at the end Jesus Christ will triumph along with his Church and the False Church, the False New Religion and the New World Order will be destroyed for ever. Sata will never, never, never win!!!

      Like

    • donnaliane72

      Dear alex,
      All Catholics know that the Catholic Church can never be destroyed; that the gates of hell will not prevail. But all that is prophesied by God in the Holy Bible will occur; it must and shall as it is God’s Word (and always has). Therefore the false prophet will come and the catholic Church (which is in fact Christs faithful people and His Witness. His Body also) will undergo severe persecution and appear to die. Also the abomination will be set up on the altar of God. Read Revelations and prophecies in Daniel and your eyes will be opened to Gods plan. He never contradicts His Word; it only appears so to us when we don’t yet fully understand how things will come to pass or what they mean. We love Holy Mother Church. And We trust in Him who created heaven and earth; the Triune God. Let Him lead you. Pick up your Bible tonight…

      Like

    • DeusServoNobis

      The Vatican is run by men who dictate the practices and doctrine that the Catholic church follows. Men are easily corrupted and influenced when presented with wealth, fame and power which is easy for satan to grant them. So why would it be blasphemous to say that satan has taken over the Vatican in order to destroy the church? It says in the Bible that this is going to happen so if it doesn’t, wouldn’t that make God a liar? Peter is the rock but the foundation of the church is Jesus Christ, so satan can never really triumph over the church because of the foundation. What is happening is the structure built on top of the foundation which is the church, is being destroyed and triumphed over by the devil. With Jesus as the true foundation, hell shall not ever prevail.

      Like

  7. Mario de los Santos

    Peter The Roman, is Saint Peter the Apostle himself.

    Like

  8. Mario de los Santos , I agree! How great is your faith! Since P.E. Benedict XVI is the Gloria Olivae, the 111th and last pope, then, after he dies there will be no more pope. He is the martyr-pope of Fatima. Our Lord promised us that “Behold I shall be with you even unto the end of the world.” He also said, “Heaven and earth shall pass away but my words shall not pass away.” In these end-days, when antichrist pope/false prophet will have emerged together with the Antichrist himself, who will lead the remnant Church, against which “the gates of hell shall not prevail,?” If we can believe that Henoch and Elijah will come to punish the world as they please until Antichrist kills them, why can’t we believe that St. Peter will come “to feed the sheep through many tribulation… until the Just Judge comes?” Didn’t Our Lord order St. Peter three times, “feed my sheep… feed my lambs?” These are the orders of Our Lord to St. Peter UNTIL THE END OF TIME “”… (but my words shall not pass away)” Can’t Our Lord send St. Peter – who founded the Holy see of ROME and the One Holy ROMAN Catholic and Apostolic Church – who BEGAN the Church – to pasture the sheep at the END of the world (as we know it?) ROME… ROMAN … (St.) “Peter the ROMAN” – isn’t that obvious?

    Like

  9. We have the infallible teaching of Vatican I to dispel any doubts that we are running out of popes: “Therefore,
    if anyone says that
    it is not by the institution of Christ the lord himself (that is to say, by divine law) that blessed Peter should have perpetual successors in the primacy over the whole church; or that
    the Roman pontiff is not the successor of blessed Peter in this primacy:
    let him be anathema” As noted before, no serious scholar believes St. Malachy wrote such prophecies. The dogmatic teaching of Vatican I still prevails.
    Vatican I: http://www.dailycatholic.org/history/20ecume3.htm
    http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=50051

    Like

    • Mario de los Santos

      No saint or holy person accepts anything without following his/her own heart first. If St. Malachy or even Satan confirms the peaceful feeling that only Jesus can give for what you think…. then you are not far from the Truth. Stay calm for even when Satan speaks, permission has gotten from Almighty God.

      Like

      • sorry but it doesn’t work that way Mario. The demons can interfere with supposed locutions and even appear as the Virgin or Jesus himself. Read St. John of the Cross who advised all to “flee from locutions”

        Like

  10. Peter Gervel

    Perhaps Petros Romanos will be like Joan of Arc ,a saint of our times who will appear to pasture the remanant christians .He will be recognised because God will be with him, for this particular mission .Time will tell us in a near future.We cannot expect that the catholic church to elect an another pontiff.The blessed Virgin foretold at Garabandal,that:After the Pope Paul vi, three Popes will appear,then will be the end.Therefore Antipope Francis is not from God,and his moto is not mentioned in Malachy’s prophetices .Petros Romanos will nourish his sheep,those who will recognise him as an Instrument of God during time of great tribulation,which will bring with it confusion of all sorts.We are living in time of great apostasy and rebellion.So we have to face persecution from some those who are not faithful to the Lord Jesus Christ.

    Like

    • Peter Gervel, Garabandal like mdm is not approved after 2-3 investigations. That’s not a good sign. As I noted earlier the Catholic Church teaches infallibly that there will always be successors of St. Peter until the end of time. That of course comes from Christ’s promise.

      Like

  11. Thomas.Anderson

    Isn’t it interesting to note that Archbishop Pietro Parolin is the new secretary of state for the Vatican, and in charge of helping reform the Vatican and ‘shake things up’. Topics like Priest celibacy is now open for discussion. Pietro (Peter) Parolin is Italian (Roman). Pope Pietro Parolin (PPP) would be quite eerey (666).

    Lastly, I would like to point out that the prophecy says that he will feed “his” sheep, not the Lord’s or The Holy Church. If the Church is to go through extreme persecution, and it’s foretold in other prophecies that the Smoke of Satan would rise within the Church; then perhaps feeding “his” sheep simply means that he will give the people what they want to eat/hear.

    Like

  12. Thomas Anderson, Pietro is quite a common name for Italian priests and as noted in my earlier post no serious scholar thinks St. Malachy wrote those “prophecies” which are quite laughable at times when examined closely. The great scholar Pope Benedict XIV for example is referred to as “farm animal”. And Parolin only pointed out that a change is possible regarding celibacy, not that it is “under discussion”.

    Like

  13. Mario de los Santos

    Thomas Anderson, read MDM message from September 23rd, 2013. A real priest should feed His sheep with the Food of Life, that is His Holy Eucharist. Sadly there will be priests who will pledge allegiance to The False Prophet and will not give any real Food of Life to His Flock.

    Fred.
    You seem to follow every respected scholar there is… but you follow less your heart.

    Like

  14. donnaliane72

    There were of course many saints and prophets not accepted or approved by the Church initially, (just as Jesus Himself) and if the False Prophet sits I on the Throne of Peter, he is hardly likely to ‘approve’ MDM.

    Like

    • Oh really? Name “many” please. Don’t presume a validly elected pope is a “false prophet”. We as Catholics should presume the opposite. Get a catechism.

      Like

  15. Maria de los Santos, My heart is with Jesus and he taught long ago that His Church will endure until the end of time and that his Vicar will be infallible. No worries.

    Like

  16. Mario de los Santos

    No Fred. Your heart is not with Jesus… Jesus is in your heart. And yes, his Vicar, Benedict XVI is infallible, the pope who came after the death of his predecessor, the one who is canonically elected, the bishop dressed in white, the one who not committed excommunication after saying how were “things” going when counting “ballots” in conclave, just when he vowed to Almighty God not to express anything to the outside world, and when approaching the final ballot counting and confident for being elected laughing: “shall I be Clement XV as a revenge or Francis the first”. God Blesses you.

    Like

  17. If you think you have reached a point where you can judge someone else’s heart then you are considering yourself an equal to God who is the only one who can do that. Seriously, you think you would know something like that based on having read a comment here? Get real. Have no idea what you are talking about the conclave. nothing has been revealed about that and if you think it was please give your source. That is just gossip and not something that anyone should be spreading. That means you.

    Like

    • Mario de los Santos

      Fred. I have reached a point where I can judge my intelligence and say that I am no one to judge. But I keep my heart in a different path.
      And I heard what I wrote coming from his own lips (in a spanish interview). I didn’t even know who Clement XIV was until Francis said it.

      Like

  18. donnaliane72

    Neither do I but I’ll find out now

    Like

  19. Mario, I should hope you are not going to judge anyone. As to the interview you are talking about the joking suggestion was made by other cardinal after he was elected. I’ll provide a link here so you can see for yourself you are distorting the incident. The other point to remember is that a pope is free to divulge details from a conclave if he chooses to do so. That is nothing new. Pope John XXIII discussed what happened at the conclave that elected him. I would remind you not to spread falsehoods about people, that can be sinful. Here is the actual quote: “”That way you can take revenge on Clement XIV for suppressing the Society of Jesus,” Francis quoted one cardinal as joking with him shortly after he was elected.” Link: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/16/us-pope-jesuits-idUSBRE92F09620130316

    Like

  20. Mario de los Santos

    Pope “Consecrates” World to Immaculate Heart with no mention of “Consecration” or the “Immaculate Heart”
    http://www.cfnews.org/page88/files/323745fe729940ab655a46013cacdcf7-150.html

    Like

  21. The translation cited here comes from a site that is SSPX oriented and the SSPX challenged the authority of Pope Benedict. And it is a quite inaccurate observation, the word “consecration” is definitely in the text. “Accept with the benevolence of a Mother
    the act of consecration that we perform today with confidence,
    before this image of you that is so dear to us.” A better translation: http://www.marytown.com/content/pope-francis-consecrates-world-to-the-immaculate-heart-of-mary

    Like

    • Mario de los Santos

      We’ll see what fruits come out of this. God Save Us All.

      Like

    • Fred, I would like to suggest that you go to the vatican website for the official translation of the words of “consecration,” which were really an entrustment, to Our Lady of Fatima, by Pope Francis on October 13, 2013. You quoted from a site (marytown.com) which used their own translator (Joseph Trabbic). Please see the vatican website: for the English translation http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/homilies/2013/documents/papa-francesco_20131013_omelia-giornata-mariana_en.html/.
      The English translation, appropriately done by the Vatican staff, says:
      “Accept with the benevolence of a Mother
      this act of entrustment that we make in faith today,
      before this your image, beloved to us.”
      This act of entrustment was made “before your image,” that is, before the statue of Our Lady of Fatima. No mention was made about the Immaculate Heart.
      It appears that followers of Pope Francis are actually ‘putting words into his mouth,’ or trying to explain off or give a positive interpretation to what he does or says, which are in fact, very obvious. As I have been saying, IN PLAIN SIGHT he has been deceiving everyone in the Church. IN PLAIN SIGHT, even in the presence of a snake-cross which he kisses, he is explained off for something positive or good. HOW MANY HAVE BEEN AND CONTINUE TO BE DECEIVED? While I do not profess believing in Maria Divine Mercy’s messages, I do believe in St. Francis of Assisi’s deathbed prophecy about an uncanonically elected pope who is called “a destroyer.’
      Try to visit this URL address, download the book in pdf format, and print your own copy (in Adobe Acrobat you have the option of printing it as a booklet, meaning you will cut the number of pages by half, since a letter sheet (back to back) will contain two pages per side.
      Here is the URL address: http://www.saintsbooks.net/books/St.%20Francis%20of%20Assisi%20-%20Works%20of%20the%20Seraphic%20Father.pdf/

      Like

  22. lyn St Clair

    Yes Fred the word conscreation is mentioned but no mention is made of Our
    Lady’s Immaculate Heart. Please STOP defending the indefensible.

    Like

    • Lynn, the word “consecration” does not exist in the original Italian version nor in the English translation from Italian, done by the Vatican staff. Please visit the Vatican site: http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/homilies/2013/documents/papa-francesco_20131013_omelia-giornata-mariana_en.html
      The original Italian entrustment prayer is here at the vatican website:
      http://www.vatican.va/news_services/liturgy/2013/documents/ns_lit_doc_20131013_atto-affidamento-maria_it.html.
      Copy and paste, put the slash sign (/), then click..
      Observe in the Italian version, in the third paragraph, the words:
      “Accogli con benevolenza di Madre
      l’atto di affidamento che oggi facciamo con fiducia,”
      “Affidamento” in English is “entrustment” (see http://translation.babylon.com/english/to-italian/)
      while the proper Italian word for “consecration” is “consacrazione; dedizione.” It is the word “affidamento” which appears in the original Italian which Pope Francis prayed before the image of Our Lady of Fatima. If he meant it to be a consecration, he would have used the word “consacrazione;” or the less exact word “dedizione.” ANd he did not use the words “Cuore Immacolato di Maria” which would mean in English “Immaculate Heart of Mary.” So you see, he did not make any consecration al all. He just made an act of ENTRUSTMENT TO THE IMAGE (STATUE) of Mary.
      I hope this enlightens you and assists you in your efforts to prove that Pope Francis did not really do what was called from a pope to consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. Now let us focus our hears and minds on Pope Emeritus, true Pope Benedict XVI. Ave Maria!

      Like

  23. lyn, you cannot say it is indefensible unless you pretend to be God and possess judgment of everything.

    Like

  24. Lyn St. Clair

    Fred one does not have to be God as you say to know when error and downright heresy is being preached.

    Like

  25. Lyn, What we are talking about here is his consecration. There is not “error and downright heresy” in the text.

    Like

  26. Mario de los Santos

    Q. What vice is opposite to faith?
    A. Heresy.
    Q. What is Heresy?
    A. Is it an obstinate error in things that are of faith.
    Q. Is it a grievous sin?
    A. A very grievous one, because it wholly divides a man from God, and leads to atheism, Christ saying, if he will not hear the church let him be to thee as an heathen and a publican, Matt. xviii. 17.
    If Francis is not objectively with Mary’s Immaculate Heart, he is objectively against It.
    Fatima: Infine il mio Cuore Immacolato trionferà

    Like

  27. Mario, There is no proof whatever he is against the Immaculate Heart. He made the consecration. He has not denied anything.

    Like

  28. Mario de los Santos

    Subtly subtly leading to atheism.
    What Francis fails to do is to strengthen the devotion to The Immaculate Heart of Mary in which at the End Will Triumph.

    Like

  29. Mario, There is no subtlety. He does not commit a heresy by not mentioning the Immaculate Heart. You can only be guilty of heresy by an actual statement.

    Like

  30. Mario de los Santos

    What Francis did, is not what Our Beloved Mother requested. And I judge that.

    Like

  31. Our Lady’s request was already fulfilled by John Paul II. I ‘ll post the link here so you can read it. Sister Lucia affirmed that consecration was acceptable. You cannot judge that. He asked for the Fatima statue to be brought to Rome just as Pope Benedict once requested it. http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20000626_message-fatima_en.html

    Like

  32. Mario de los Santos

    Fred. Then something is really missing.
    He made an “affidamento” (which is not a Consacrazione) in order to “revive and grow faith” in something only Francis knows about and no one else.
    He did this at the request of no one,
    Something is empty here.

    Like

  33. Mario,
    Why? Whoever said a consecration has to be requested? When I was in grade school we consecrated ourselves to the Immaculate Heart but Our Lady never asked us to. A consecration cannot really be empty. What is empty in these words: “bless and strengthen every desire for good;

    revive and nourish faith;

    sustain and enlighten hope;

    awaken and animate charity;

    guide all of us along the path of holiness.

    Teach us your own preferential love

    for the little and the poor,

    for the excluded and the suffering,

    for sinners and the downhearted:

    bring everyone under your protection

    and entrust everyone to your beloved Son, Our Lord Jesus.

    Like

  34. Lyn St Clair

    Fred you can defend Bishop Francis all you like but the fact remains he has proved himself to be a modernist a heretic and he hates part of the sheep he
    supposedly has been given commission to care for – namely traditional catholics. He has accused them of many things- since you defend him so staunchly you would be aware of all the names he has called them so I won’t repeat it again. Go on defending him Fred- you are doing a great job. As for
    me and my house we will serve Our Lord and His Bride Holy Mother Church.

    Like

  35. So we are being asked to believe that Pope Emeritus didn’t have any say in his resignation! He’s a ”virtual prisoner” who has been “carefully removed!” Was he lying when he told the faithful. ”I will continue to be close to you in prayer, especially in the next few days, so that you are fully accepting of the action of the Holy Spirit in the election of the new pope” He continued with “May the Lord show you what he wants. Among you there is the future pope, to whom I today declare my unconditional reverence and obedience.”

    Benedict also stated when speaking to the Cardinals before the election ”among you is the new Pope that from now on I promise my obedience.”

    Like

  36. Lyn, we could not say that Pope Francis hates anyone, he has criticized certain aspects of things but his criticism has also been directed against liberal Catholics otherwise he would not be proceeding with the action against the LCWR begun under Pope Benedict. You would have a hard time proving him a “modernist heretic” as he has endorsed the catechism in its entirety which does not make him a heretic but a Catholic. Exactly what “name calling” are you referring to? It’s pretty hard to discuss anything if you don’t provide some actual quotes. If you attack Francis as an antipope you place yourself outside the church so you cannot be said to be serving the Church. That is a contradiction.

    Like

  37. Blessed are those who don’t see yet believe…In the coming days, when things inside the Holy Mother Church will change in its old fashion way of spreading God’s Word then please take time to discern because God’s Words will never change. In the end, our obedience will judge us.

    Like

  38. Elmar Franz

    Pope Petrus Romanus is nothing else than APOSTLE PETRUS himself, who will reign from heaven. This is Petrus Romanus. The first and the last pope.

    Like

    • DeusServoNobis

      That sounds like the most probable answer I’ve heard concerning Malachy’s prediction of who the 112th pope will be. Franny is for sure not the last pope which is pretty clear to see. I guess Benedict who is #111 isn’t the last pope there will be either, just the last living mortal pope if Elmar is right. It would be pretty cool to see God’s Apostle Peter reclaim his papacy during the last days to help lead God’s people during those troubling times to come. Guess we will find out soon enough.

      Like

  39. Real Peter the Apostle is implied.

    Those who remain loyal to Me, and those who reject the abomination, will be guided by Peter the Apostle, who sat in the first Seat of Rome. He will guide My beloved Benedict, who will, as foretold, help them to see the Truth. He will have to witness the horror, but he will be supported by those who have sworn allegiance to the One True Word of God.

    http://www.thewarningsecondcoming.com/they-will-be-accused-of-crimes-against-the-seat-of-peter-and-will-be-publicly-humiliated-in-my-holy-name/

    Like

  40. This Pope is a heretic. What more proof do we need. I see him being overshadowed from behind by a skull in black hooded casock which confirms to me that he is working for Lucifer. Pray pray pray for him that God may shorten the time of Chasetisement that is coming and pray for ourselves that we may be protected during these chaseticements. Why not every person realise that all that is happening is in accordance with Gods end time plans to save humanity as foretold. This plan includes his decision to allow the devil to put in place pope Francis the fallen episcopate who must serve his purpose in fullfilling the end time biblical events leading the people of the world to worship the image of the first beast Rev 13: 11-15 (inserting of micro chips). Don’t we understand that the final spiritual battle between God and Satan must happen as it is the only way that God must reclaim the earthly kingdom from the clutches of Satan so that a renewed paradise promised to Jesus be given to his people(remmnants). In this spiritual battle man being spiritually centred must also suffer physically as the pain experienced and accepted in faith is penance directly connected with our spiritual nourishment that urges us to pray and be intimately connected to Jesus sufferings hence, God. Its only through our suffering and prayer can we be of any use to others whom God wants to be saved. We have only God to loose if we follow blindly those who perpetrate to rip the ten commandments apart as already demostrated in the various writtings and interview of this Pope. So pray for Pope Francis. On the other hand, Pope Benedict continues to be a spiritual inspiration as the pope for those who believe in the centuries old Marian messages in which one states that “there will come a time when there shall be two popes, one the true vicar of Christ and the other an imposter”. This brings us to the point that one can argue with his scholarly human interllect on this page against these revelations by Saints and Mystics, but the realities are that such arguements do not prove anything much other than proving pride to be at work against Jesus. The truth is 1. we are living in the end times 2 there is a false prophet among us who is called pope Francis
    3 there will come in a short while later (2014) the anti-christ 4. God will confirm his remmnant flock 5. Christ will come in glory meaning, as a powerful light and energy into the hearts of his followers who will embrace his truth to the end and hence the new heaven on earth (“your kingdom come your Will be done on earth as in Heaven”).

    Like

  41. donnaliane72

    Thank you Sam. That seems inspired. It draws together everything very well. I really appreciate the reference to pain and suffering in particular( as our penance ) as it has not been discussed enough on this forum, I think. I am left wondering about the statements at the very end as I have not read that before. The Bible tells us Jesus will come again on a cloud of glory… I can also see how his glory will come into our hearts and empower us to do Gods Will. I was wondering if you can shed light on how these two events fit together? If you don’t really know that’s ok; Im happy to revel in this mystery.

    Like

  42. Donnaliane, the spirit makes me understand that in these times the majority of christian Catholics and Christian believers in the one true God would desert him to follow the anti-christ and the false prophet in their one world pagan religion. The remmnant followers of Christ would remain a minority and as stated in Matt10:22 these remmnants will be hated because of their allegience to Jesus. The next line states however, that who ever holds out to the end will be saved. The truth is that those who blindly follow the anti-christ in the first instance but later realise that they have made a mistake and try to make a turnaround would face persecution and death. Those who stand fast to the truth from now and onwards would be fully protected, although hated, would not face persecution because they would be a member of the worldwide remmnant body of Christ. Therfore to answer your question on how these two events fit together is that, the period from now to the time Christ returns in the clouds, those who are called by God Almighty to follow Jesus have their names written in the book of life and by virtue of that calling are entitled through a prayerful life in God a powerful inner conversion to attain the state of the Divinity of their Lord Jesus Christ during these times leading up to and within the period of the great chastisement. It is the work of the Holy Spirit to mould them, prune them and nurse them now in the Immacculate Heart of Mary to grow them into the Divinity of Jesus Christ even before the troubles as stated in Mathew 24 arrive or worsen. That is the powerful transformation light of Jesus to be imparted by the Holy Spirit that I have mentioned earlier. Therefore before christ comes in the clouds he must ensure that the remmnant believers do survive the great chasetisement to the end (Matt 10;22) to form the new shinning and radiant One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. Christ will than come down on the clouds in Glory to be welcomed by the remmnant church he had formed into his Divinity through the workings of the Holy Spirit. The Triumph of the Immaculate Heart is achieved when the remmnant body of Jesus Christ has been transformed into His Divinity and this must precede His second coming in Glory. I would advise if you have not done so to consecrate into the Immaculate Heart of Mary. After all that is the Ark every one must get into to be safe and be moulded into jesus’s Divinity.

    Like

    • DeusServoNobis

      I agree with all you said Sam. It’s pretty much the same message I got about what is to happen to God’s people during the end times. Many mouth professing Christians will be deceived in the masses by the false prophet and antichrist when they start performing miracles through the power of the devil. Those are the kind of Christians that only know and do what they are told by the church because they think that this is how to be obedient to God, so they are lead to believe. That religion is god but not God himself. They don’t think twice about doing whatever it is they are told to do nor do they question the circumstances or the ones who direct them. With the help of television, satan will deceive most the world into following the antichrist and false prophet during these times. People of all walks, creeds and religions will follow him and see him as the return of the messiah or some kind of god. Many of those that are mislead will later on return to the True God when they finally see that they were really following satan the whole time. Or when the real Messiah Jesus Christ returns. Before this, they will cheer when the people of God are persecuted and even call for the deaths of their brethren just as the Jews did with Christ. The people of God will be hunted and murdered in the streets or in their homes. Many Christians will die for the sake of our Father and his Living Word and will become the saints that are in heaven after they die. The ones who live will be driven underground into the mountains where they will remain until the destruction of the earth is finished and God keeps to his Word. These people would be the remnants of God left on the earth that will repopulate the world with the one True God to lead them for 1000 years.

      I’m sure there will be a lot of Bible burning as they bring in their new one world religion while at the same time, they go around hunting down all the real Christians who were driven from their homes. We can already see how they are trying to remove any trace of God from all of human society today and how franny is attempting to create this new one world religion as he phases in the changes. Eventually they will have their new satanic bibles taking the place of God’s Word I’m sure and owning a Bible would be punishable by death. The mouth professing Christians who were mislead by satan will eventually be forced to swear their allegiance to him or face systematic execution. This would be their last chance to show God who they really choose to serve. Their new master satan, their own mortal life which is self and also satan, or God who is Jesus Christ, Creator of all, King and Judge. Heads will roll and all of Heaven will cry out for justice. The reality of it all is that if you are a real Christian, you will likely not survive to be a remnant when all this takes place. It would be the closest thing that would resemble hell on earth though hell itself is unimaginably far worse. Where all you are is a feast for devils as they torment you.

      So as Sam suggest, consecrate yourselves to God now because these tribulations will soon be on us. It would be a blessing to meet any true Christian brothers or sisters during this time and I hope you guys can come together and help each other survive. Keep the Word of the Lord always and prepare your souls for whatever outcome or end we may each face soon.

      Like

  43. Thank you Sam; that explains a lot and fills in some of the missing details.

    Like

  44. donnaliane72

    Praise the Truth! yet do not fear. Place your trust in Him and carry His Seal. The Seal of Protection. I have already met my brothers and sisters here and I fondly look forward to meeting and embracing you all in the New Paradise. I can’t describe the fondness and love I feel for you as if I’ve met you already, some of you older, like elders, some like younger brothers , some sisters, but I don’t need to tell you; you know it too. I need your prayers though to strengthen me and my family and your words to encourage me. I will try to be ready; God help us all. We all know it’s imminent; those who listen to their hearts.

    Like

  45. donnaliane72

    Thats a really good analogy. With your permission, I’ll use that one. Thank you

    Like

  46. If Pope Francis is the Petrus Romanus, who is the political antichrist, if anything that is been written abouut Petrus Romanus is true, then then antichrist must be a prominent powerful political figure in office right now.

    My question is who is the antichrist???

    Like

  47. The time for St. Peter to lead the Church on Earth still can come…. If Pope Francis is an false prophet, then his election is not valid and Benedict is still effective Pope. According Fatima’s messages, ” a Bishop in white (= not a pope on first look) will be killed…. Taht could be Benedict. But as this will be not immediately followed by Jesus’ coming, the only next pope will be St. Peter from Heaven…. that has a sense and is not against any dogma.
    Once the all prophecies not only the MDM’s will fulfill, then we can not expect any conclave to vote another pope…. Beside that, the pope can be only one alive, so Benedict is that right one yet.
    As somne body wrote here above, if you read the complete MDM’s messages and also prophecies from other saints and seers, you will see, it fits together like puzzle :-)

    Like

    • Remnant Clergy

      Yes, Benedict XVI is the bishop in white described in the third secret of Fatima vision. Peter the Roman (on earth) has yet to come, after Benedict XVI is martyred as the Fatima prophecy says.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s